IN this reflective post of 4 to 5 paragraphs, you need to consider the animation qualities of your cartoon and the animation qualities of the group as a whole.
Take a look at your own graphs. How well did your data illustrate the principles of constant velocity, horizontal accleration, and vertical acceleration? Would you say that your original hypotheses in the previous posts were confirmed or rejected?
Next, take a look at the class data as a whole. Comment on the skill of the cel animators of the 1950s and use specific data to support your reasoning (statements like "Out of the 8 data sets in class for constant velocity, X were...." )
Do you believe cel animators of the 1950s were more, less, or equally as adept as the animations found in the 1960s and 1970s (Hanna-Barbera, or the Flinstones) or 21st century in shows like King of the Hill, the Simpsons, or the Power Puff girls? Why?
How would a knowledge of physics help if you were to pursue a career in videography or animation? Explain your rationale?
Finally, were there any instances in the cartoon you watched where the normal laws of physics, as you understand them, were suspended? How can animators get away with that?
